Quantcast
Channel: Family Tree Maker software - Family History & Genealogy Message Board
Viewing all 22081 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Saved Ancestry records (saved online only v. downloaded offline)?

$
0
0
I'm assuming your FTM tree and Ancestry tree are unlinked, but your FTM tree is online, and you have been using Web Search and Merge to load "documents". I'm also assuming your tree is not huge and your goal is to bring your FTM tree into "compliance" with your online tree; and by documents, you don't just mean media, but also people, and records with sources and citations. If so, the basic idea is: don't try to figure out what differences exist between the two trees, but eliminate them, or at least minimize them.

The method is to create a new FTM tree by downloading your online tree, and then merge that tree with your original FTM tree. It is essentially a one-way sync, i.e. the method only transfers data from your online tree into your FTM tree. Before doing all this, backup your original FTM tree by copying the several files to a safe place.

For me, the option to create a new FTM tree by downloading an Ancestry tree is functionally gone in both FTM 2012 and FTM 2014. The option reverts to creating a GEDCOM file which you then download. Of course this file has no media. If you can create a new FTM tree by truly downloading your online tree, do it, and then merge the two FTM trees.

However, if you end up with a new FTM tree created by a GEDCOM, open both your original and new FTM trees (preferably side-by-side half screen) and make note of the number of people and sources in each tree to get a rough idea how far apart the two trees are. Then close-out the new tree window and merge the two trees in whatever direction you prefer. All the people, sources and citations from your online tree are now in the merged FTM tree. It would be a good idea to also backup the new FTM tree files before starting this process.

Media from your online tree that is not in your merged FTM tree can be found several ways. For FTM citations with media, look for missing media icons in the various citation lists. The media can then be copied from your online tree to your computer, and ultimately into your merged FTM tree. Other missing media can be found by going to the FTM Media workspace and selecting list by person, and then compare the FTM media gallery for a given person, with his or her online tree media gallery. You can use side-by-side half screen for each tree, and if need be, use your browser to scale down the online gallery. Census media and other citation media will show-up in your online gallery, but not in the merged FTM tree. So don't try to copy this media into a person's FTM media gallery.

To avoid all these headaches, it may be worth upgrading to FTM 2017 and using the sync function, particularly if you have a large tree.

Re: Saved Ancestry records (saved online only v. downloaded offline)?

$
0
0
Which version of FTM do you have?

P.S. Also how big is your tree?

P.P.S. By documents, are you referring to just media, or are you also talking about people, sources, and citations. If more than just media, can your version of FTM merge trees?

Re: Errors in places database

$
0
0
Regarding Düsseldorf and Vecbebri, it looks like the best thing to do is use Replace This Place pop-up and select Ignore. On your places list, this will show the names outside the Germany group of locales. The names will have a check mark and they will filter and show in reports.

Neuhausen... should still be a standard name and not a standard name with a detail. It's just not recognized by the Place Authority. A detail is a fifth name, such as a cemetery, added to a standard four name place. Thus the name of the window; although it can be used to modify a standard place name as well - as long as the name is recognized by the Place Authority.

Re: Time for an update?

$
0
0
I read the post a few minutes ago, and I did not get a warm and fuzzy feeling all over my body.

Re: Time for an update?

$
0
0
It's the initial roll-out syncing they are worried about, and this is what I'm talking about. Not ordinary syncing. From the blog:

• Ancestry will be taking a look at their gateway and other services to see if they can scale up capacity in a few areas to handle greater load. The goal will be to have a greater buffer when, as expected, a large number of FTM users will try out the system all at once. 


• Depending on where we are when ready to launch, we may consider a plan where we do a staggered release to prevent a situation where all users start syncing all at once as they start up FTM 2017 for the first time. We will be reaching out to those getting the new edition to find out who is eager to get started and who'd prefer that others test the system first. 


Re: Errors in places database

$
0
0
"I can correct the name and ignore the suggested place name"

I'm not sure what you mean by correcting the name. Nevertheless, have you tried the following, which is used to add a cemetery or other detail to a four word location.

Assuming Neuhausen... is sitting outside of Switzerland in the place list, right click on the name and select Resolve This Place Name. When the pop-up appears, do not accept the Place Authority name, but instead move just Neuhausen from the Place Name window up into the Place Detail window and hit the Replace button. The non official name should now appear in the place tree inside of Switzerland, along with the official name.

Re: Time for an update?

$
0
0
I know nothing about main frame computers. That said, if the problem is the gateway getting overloaded by bizzillions of sync requests, is it possible to restrict traffic within, or ahead of, the gateway by allowing a certain range of family tree numbers on a given day to sync their trees? Would this be a difficult thing to do?

Re: FTM 2017 Latest News - Another, More Extended, Delay

$
0
0
Just like magic, my web search and merge have returned. For how long, I haven't a clue.

Re: FTM 2017 Latest News - Another, More Extended, Delay

$
0
0
Looks like my web search and merge just got blown away right in the middle of me using it. Running FTM 2012 and still have hints, map, and dashboard.

Re: FTM 2012 Individual Report Not Showing All Facts

$
0
0
Bingo! That was the problem. Thanks for the help.

FTM 2012 Individual Report Not Showing All Facts

$
0
0
I'm using FTM 2012 and Windows 8.1, and I'm getting some strange results in Individual Reports that have Property facts (predefined) and/or Land facts (custom). If an individual has more than one Property fact or Land fact, only one will appear in the Individual Report. It makes no difference if I'm online or not. I've included a .jpg to show both scenarios. Any thoughts as to why this is happening?

Need To Repair Damaged Family Tree Maker 11 File

$
0
0
I have found where my file in my book is damaged. I removed the offending document, deleted the person originally associated with the damaged file, and even tried to delete the book that had the original problem. Family Tree Maker 11 will not allow me to delete the book nor the original page that had the error. Any other ideas how to remove the offending book?

Re: Need To Repair Damaged Family Tree Maker 11 File

$
0
0
Is this version 11 or product named 2011?

Re: Web Search: Your Search returned zero good matches

$
0
0
jnye42,

Yes, that corrected my problem. Thank you very much for the suggestion!

Re: Family Tree Maker 2011

$
0
0
Thanks for that. Just paid $33.75 aussie shipped!

Re: Family Tree Maker 2011

Re: Family Tree Maker 2011

$
0
0
Thank You for the link. Does it work for Australia. Sorry for the dumb question. Just not up on this. Regards

Re: Family Tree Maker 2011

Re: FTM 2017, Not able to get info from Ancestry

$
0
0
Did you resolve this? I am getting the same thing on ancestry.com (not using FTM). Has never happened before today.

Syncing FTM to Ancestry but not everyone in my tree syncs

$
0
0
I'm a newbie at FTM and tried my first sync to my Ancestry.com tree. Looks like most of the people synced, but not all. For example a husband and wife synced but none of their children showed up on Ancestry. I input them in FTM and thought that they would be added to Ancestry. Did I do something wrong?
Viewing all 22081 articles
Browse latest View live