I think I just drove myself crazy.
Using Massachusetts Vital Records. The RECORD is actually a record of INTENTION to marriage, certificate issued, etc. So it should go under the fact MARRIAGE LICENSE.
However, it comes up in online tree to attach to the MARRIAGE fact.
So I let it do that and then thought I'd move it over.. first that resulted in the source being completely deleted. Now I just left it on both.
Here is what I think I did wrong: When I said "new" source, then used existing source, and I found it by the person's name, I think I should have said COPY source instead of link to source.. Then I could have deleted it from the marriage?
Does that sound right?
Using Massachusetts Vital Records. The RECORD is actually a record of INTENTION to marriage, certificate issued, etc. So it should go under the fact MARRIAGE LICENSE.
However, it comes up in online tree to attach to the MARRIAGE fact.
So I let it do that and then thought I'd move it over.. first that resulted in the source being completely deleted. Now I just left it on both.
Here is what I think I did wrong: When I said "new" source, then used existing source, and I found it by the person's name, I think I should have said COPY source instead of link to source.. Then I could have deleted it from the marriage?
Does that sound right?