I guess I still have not been clear.
I have 10K+ people in my tree, but the publishing part of it is just a small fragment, pertinent to the recipient of the album.
My paternal cousins are not at all interested in my maternal line, and the reverse. Most people would be absolutely lost beyond about 4 generations and could not be bothered with collateral lines.
I see no value in killing trees to publish information that does not interest the recipient.
I work in story format - with illustrations: the grand uncle who helped build the Holland Tunnel; the 2xg GF who was wounded in the Civil War; the several 3xg and 4xg GF who received land bounty grants for their military service.
I have 10K+ people in my tree, but the publishing part of it is just a small fragment, pertinent to the recipient of the album.
My paternal cousins are not at all interested in my maternal line, and the reverse. Most people would be absolutely lost beyond about 4 generations and could not be bothered with collateral lines.
I see no value in killing trees to publish information that does not interest the recipient.
I work in story format - with illustrations: the grand uncle who helped build the Holland Tunnel; the 2xg GF who was wounded in the Civil War; the several 3xg and 4xg GF who received land bounty grants for their military service.